Pornography in the United States by state

I would like to introduce some issues that have come up with regard to pornography in the United States, especially over the last three decades. This subject has recently been discussed in France, with the publications of works by philosophers such as Ruwen Ogien and Michela Marzano, and of legal scholars such as Marcella Iacub. What these studies have in common is not that they consider pornography as an object of study in itself, but as a way to approach indirectly the issue of freedom of speech. The problem of pornography in the United States has spawned rather vast legal and philosophic debates about the foundations of freedom of speech. The history of censorship emphasizes an important issue: for a certain mode of expression to be censored, it must be perceived as being precisely other than just a mode of expression — either it is more than an expression (an act), or it is less (a mere sexual arousal, for example). The trivial subject of pornography gives rise to a number of related issues that are not trivial at all: how can one establish a distinction between facts and words? Between acts and language? Between the harmful and the harmless? In this perspective, I shall discuss the use of the theory of speech acts by American feminists to justify a limitation, or a restriction of pornography. But it seems that problems posed here are broad enough to be of use in other frameworks, and in other contexts.

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Gay male pornography in the United States" right now.

Pornography in the United States has always been controversial. It has been subject to attempts to have it banned in a number of strategies, including outright ...

Pornography in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are few practical legal restrictions on rape pornography in the United States. Operation iGuardian, as it was called, was run as a part of the agency's larger and sought to identify and arrest those who allegedly "own, trade and produce" child pornography in the United States and its territories. So far in 2013, the agency has arrested 1,674 people for this type of crime, and more than 10,000 in the last decade.

indication of the extent of child pornography in the United States

While it is true that popular opinion binds some to regard the United States' 1st Amendment as a blanket license for the proliferation of pornography as an unlimited right to freedom of expression gone wild, pornography abuses and its unfettered spread needs to be better regulated by law. In the Texas Law Review a discussion around this very topic and the “evils that sexual exploitation inflicts upon children” helps explain a First Amendment defense oftentimes used to excuse using child subjects in pornographic based recordings. (p. 1101). The argument, states the Texas Law Review summary, revolves around the a technicality of a twisted reasoning that state and federal statutes which require “no knowledge” as to the child subject's age somehow limits their freedom of speech (p. 1102). Basically in this paper, three points are being made. The First Amendment cannot be logically used to excuse the unregulated proliferation of pornography. Secondly, the ease of Internet use provides easy access for children to watch pornographic material. Thirdly, not every adult is interested in being bombarded with pornography laden advertisements which often mask their intent in a sneaky way. Pornography in the United States should be restricted by law, whether the activity involves consenting adults or the sexual abuse of children in order to guarantee the protection and privacy of all citizens.

In 2007, pornography in the United States was a $10 billion industry