Hobbes versus Locke American Literature

Social contract theories differ about the object of the contract. Inthe traditional contract theories of Hobbes and Locke the contract wasabout the terms of political association. In particular, the problemwas the grounds and limits of citizen's obligation to obey thestate. In his early formulation, Rawls's parties deliberated about“common practices” (1958). In his later statement of hisview Rawls took the object of agreement to be principles of justice toregulate “the basic structure:”

Bridging the Ancient and Modern: Thoughts on Machiavelli, Hobbes and Locke

Locke’s contract was for a judge. Hobbes’s contract was for a master. While in some situations the distinction between these two roles may be fuzzy, it is clear that vast majority of people today encounter the state in the role of master, rather than judge, thus the modern state is far more Hobbesian than Lockean, though it is still very far from the absolutist government that Hobbes commended.

JORNAL DE FILOSOFIA: Teorias contratualistas de Hobbes e Locke

ASBAVA: Hobbes Locke Rousseau Karşılaştırması Montesquieu published his greatest work, , in 1748. Unlike Hobbes and Locke, Montesquieu believed that in the state of nature individuals were so fearful that they avoided violence and war. The need for food, Montesquieu said, caused the timid humans to associate with others and seek to live in a society. “As soon as man enters into a state of society,” Montesquieu wrote, “he loses the sense of his weakness, equality ceases, and then commences the state of war.”

bild 10 menschenbild bei hobbes und locke hobbes und locke

Finally, of the two, John Locke could be considered as an honorary founding father of the United States. As seen in his ideas being used by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence and by the principles of separating powers included in the Constitution, his contributions justify placing him in that group of great men. There are two things he would be opposed to in the Constitution however. One being the lack of recognition of or allowing for rebellion in the event of a tyrannical government and second in the limitations of power upon the executive, especially since that individual would not be a monarch. Locke was in favor of monarchy when balance with a law making legislature like the Parliament. It seems that Hobbes opposition to revolution has lived on in the exclusion of this right from the founding document of the United States. Whatever the views that one has on Hobbes or Locke, it is important to see that both have had a profound influence on modern politics, human rights and specifically in the formation of the United States of America.

Hobbes vs Locke - Visual Venn Diagram - YouTube