The religious and moral argument against embryonic stem cells is that the taking of a human life is necessary to extract the cells. It is not a far step away from using what is discarded after an abortion to actually growing them on purpose to harvest.
Stem cell research—why is it regarded as a threat?
Pro-life arguments against stem cells are not against the research that comes from adult stem cells. These cells do not cause harm to the person they are taken from. In most situations adult stem cells are taken from the patient's bone marrow, then grown in a laboratory over several days. The cells are then injected into the patient where needed. This type of treatment is actually being done today with some measure of success. With the possibilities being promising more researchers should concentrate in this area over using embryonic stem cells because doing so would not be unethical.
Stem cell research—why is it regarded as a threat
Looking at Israel's history in the Old Testament a person will find that when the children of Israel were rebellious and refused to follow the Lord terrible things happened to them. In fact, the Bible is plain that anyone who refuses to obey God is cursed. Many times Israel faced defeat and exile because of their disobedience. They were often influenced by other nations to the point that they even sacrificed their children to idols. What does this example say for those who are disobedient to God's word today? God has not changed. His word does not change. Pro-life arguments against stem cells are based upon the word of God. Even Christians become influenced by worldly ideas and slowly may accept things that society accepts especially if we don't keep God's word before us everyday to remind us of right and wrong. As a nation we need to seek God and ask Him to guide us in His will.
The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research | Fox News
By using stem cells and discarding the embryo, it is thought that human life is ultimately de-valued by this act and is paving a slippery slope for further scientific procedures that similarly de-value life. In particular, many religious groups who are adamantly pro-life have condemned embryonic stem cell research and all of its applications. Other arguments against embryonic stem cells cite the fact that adult stem cells are the ones currently being used in therapies and thus, there is no need to even venture into embryonic stem cell territory. 4. The final argument used by those who would like to advance the research of embryonic stem cells is superiority, that embryonic stem cells can be considered a lot better therapeutically than adult stem cells (Wikipedia, 2008). Embryonic stem cells are easier to grow into cultures; they divide quicker, and they are much more abundant than adult stem cells, not to mention that embryonic stem cells can treat a wider range of diseases than adult stem cells (Wikipedia, 2008). There are just as many arguments against embryonic stem cells as there are for, but the biggest question is the grey area between where human life begins, whether it is in a fertilized egg, in the womb, or when the fetus can survive independently from the mother.